Abbe, et al. v. City of San DiegoCase SummaryJackson DeMarco Tidus Peckenpaugh represents approximately 1,300 current and former San Diego Police Officers in the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) overtime case Abbe, et al. v. City of San Diego ("Abbe") U.S. District Court Case No. 3:05-cv-01629 DMS(RBB) 2005. The Abbe lawsuit asserts that the San Diego Police Department required the Officers to work before and after their regular shifts and through “Code 7’s” meal periods for the benefit of the City of San Diego without compensation in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). The required activities include performing pre- and post- shift responsibilities; preparing for court appearances; completing arrest and investigation reports; donning and doffing of protective gear; and performing various other required tasks. The claims seek reimbursement retroactive to four years prior to the date of filing of the lawsuit (August 16, 2005). The firm recently filed 504 motions for summary judgment and the court has scheduled a hearing on these motions. A decision by the court would typically follow shortly thereafter. The Abbe case is one of three cases that JDTP is litigating on behalf of San Diego Police Officers and the San Diego Police Officers Association. Aaron, et al. v. Michael Aguirre, City of San Diego, et al. and SDPOA v. Michael Aguirre, City of San Diego, et al. address the City’s underfunding of the San Diego City Employee Retirement System, the mishandling by the City of the police officers’ pension contributions and other issues, including claims of breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, fraud, breach of contract, retaliation and conspiracy to commit civil rights violations. Related casesAaron, et al. v. Aguirre, City of San Diego, et al. Case # 06-cv-1451 H(POR) 2006 Court Documents
Press Releases
These materials have been prepared by Jackson DeMarco Tidus Peckenpaugh for informational purposes only and are not intended as legal advice. The information available on the Web site is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This information on legal issues available here is not a substitute for legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction. |
